Richardson Vista Corp. v. City of Anchorage
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, District Judge.
In an opinion in this case dated February 29, 1952, on a motion to dismiss, the Court directed that the plaintiffs, file a verified amended and supplemental complaint stating the facts with relation to the filing of plaintiffs’ annual reports and payment of annual license fees as required by law, but reserved decision on another question raised on the motion to dismiss involving what was said to be a statute of limitations based upon Chapter 8, Sec. 503.1 of the General Code of Ordinances of the City of Anchorage.
After the filing of the amended and supplemental…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Portland v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Wong Sing v. IndependenceOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Wilson v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.