State v. Buck
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
This was an indictment fór stealing two robes, alleged to be of the value of thirty-six dollars. The defendant was convicted of stealing one of the robes named in the indictment, and the jury found and stated in their' verdict that the robe stolen by the defendant was of the value of twenty dollars;
1Opinion of the Court
The Court
held, that, notwithstanding only the collective value of the property alleged to have been stolen is stated in the indictment, yet, if the jury find the defendant guilty of stealing a part only of the property, and, in their verdict, *532state the value of the articles so stolen by him, judgment may be well rendered upon such verdict.
Tenney, C. J., and Appleton, Cutting, May, Davis, and Kent, J. J., concurred.
2Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- State v. StrumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- State v. BrewWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. HibberdOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. FortuneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.