Legal Opinion

State v. Brew

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1892No. 276PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Cowrt, San Juan County. Information against Thomas Brew, charging him, with two other parties, with stealing certain carpenters’ tools, “of the value of fifty dollars.” From a judgment of conviction defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J. —

The only question that can be considered by the court in this case is the sufficiency of the indictment. No statement of facts has been settled or certified, and a certificate of the clerk of what occurred at the trial could not be notice to this court. The office of a statement of facts is to bring to the notice of this court the very questions sought to be brought to its notice by the certificate of the clerk. In this case the indictment, in substance, charges the crime of grand larceny, committed by stealing a lot of carpenter tools,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCarty v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State v. HoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1864
  3. State v. HartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  4. State v. BeattySupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  5. State v. BuckSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lehman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. State v. StrumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  3. State v. HibberdOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. FortuneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Bone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API