Legal Opinion

Hurford v. Norvall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1913No. 3310PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Pottawatomie County; Geo. C. Abernathy, Judge. Action by F. S. Norvall against A. H. Hurford and Roy Jenkins, partners, doing business as Hurford & Jenkins, and another. Judgment for plaintiff and the defendant not named, and the defendants named bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

F. S. Norvall brought suit in a justice of the peace court against Hurford & Jenkins, a real estate firm, and Green M. Stewart, for $100. The case was taken on appeal to the county court and was transferred from there to the superior court of Pottawatomie county, where a trial resulted in a judgment for the amount claimed against Hurford & Jenkins; Stewart being held not liable. At the conclusion of the evidence the court instructed the jury to find for plaintiff as against Hurford & Jenkins and to find for the defendant Stewart.

The facts out of which this controversy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gulf City Construction Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Huffman v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. DEPT. OF SECURITIES EX REL. FAUGHT v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  2. Oklahoma Department of Securities ex rel. Faught v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  3. Sarkeys v. MarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Hall v. DealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Will v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API