Legal Opinion

Hall v. Deal

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 17, 1951No. 34227PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The parties are reversed in their appearance here from their positions in the trial court, but we shall refer to them as they appeared in that court.

Defendant, C. J. Hall, was engaged in the real estate business in Oklahoma City under the name “City Mortgage and Sales Company.”

Judgment was rendered by the trial court on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s demurrers to plaintiff’s petition and to his evidence.

Plaintiff, Roy B. Deal, in his petition, alleges that he entered into negotiations with J.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States Zinc Co. v. ColburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Citizens Bank of Millerton v. BeesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Mayor v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Watson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Hurford v. NorvallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ruth P. v. State, Department of Institutions, Social & Rehabilitative ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Benton v. OrtenbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Calhoun v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. In Re GossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Ruth P. v. State, Department of Institutions, Social & Rehabilitative ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API