Legal Opinion
Seaboard Terminals Corp. v. Standard Oil Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 17, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ABRUZZO, District Judge.
The plaintiffs commenced this action against the defendants in June of 1936, charging a violation of the Sherman AntiTrust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note. A conspiracy to destroy the business of the plaintiffs in the State of Maryland is the basis of this suit. They are seeking treble damages. The defendants, Standard Oil Company of New Jersey and The American Oil Company, are no longer party defendants in this action. The suit has survived as against the SoconyVacuum Oil Company, Incorporated.
• There are three motions before the court, all made by the only remaining…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Forty-One Thirty-Six Wilcox Bldg. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States ex rel. Colonial Brick Corp. v. Federal Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- Walder v. Paramount Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Deutsch ex rel. Deutsch v. Aaron & Lillie Straus Foundation, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1957
- B. J. Semel Associates, Inc., and B. J. Semel D/B/A South East Fire-Works v. United Fireworks Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- B. J. Semel Associates, Inc., and B. J. Semel D/B/A South East Fire-Works v. United Fireworks Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966