Legal Opinion

State v. Ponce

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 2, 2012No. 29288-6-111PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiddoway, J.

¶1 In State v. J.P., 130 Wn. App. 887, 125 P.3d 215 (2005), this court held that because the statutory defense of abandonment of property negates the unlawful entry element of the crime of criminal trespass, abandonment should be available as a defense to residential burglary, which shares the same element. In this appeal, Antonio Ponce relies on J.P. to argue that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that his defense of permissible entry to the crime of criminal trespass, which similarly negates unlawful entry, was a defense to second degree burglary as well. We agree with…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CorderoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. State Of Washington v. Jeremiah TeasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Summers v. FeatherDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  4. State Of Washington v. Anthony MyersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington v. Chad C. BassCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API