Smith v. Intel Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DARQUES SMITH, et al., Case No. 23-cv-05761-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 INTEL CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 49 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel”)’s motion to dismiss. 14 Dkt. No. 49. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and 15 deems it submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants the 16 motion in part and denies it in part. 17 I.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.