Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1931No. 13138PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CALHOUN, Judge.

Offense, burglary; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

This is the second appeal in this case. The former is reported in 113 Texas Crim. Rep., 85, 18 S. W. (2d) 1086.

The state relied wholly upon circumstantial evidence for conviction, there being no testimony in the case directly showing the number of men participating in the burglary or the identity of any person or persons who took part in or were present at the time of the commission of the offense. The bank in the town of Peacock was burglarized. A recently discharged pistol was found the next morning.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Munson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Bowen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Lawrence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carlsen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Carlsen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Denby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Denby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API