Legal Opinion

Denby v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1983No. 62561Published

1Opinion

OPINION ON STATE’S MOTIONS FOR REHEARING

CLINTON, Judge.

Leave to file motion for rehearing was granted the State in these causes and they were consolidated in order for us to determine whether the “standard for appellate review” is the same for circumstantial evidence cases and direct evidence cases.

The question of sufficiency of evidence to sustain a state criminal conviction implicates the Fourteenth Amendment. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 n. 12, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 n. 12, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), “announced ... the constitutional minimum required to enforce the due process right” to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API