Legal Opinion

United States v. Yee Ping Jong

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1939No. E-3442, E-3444PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

Yee Haim was found guilty upon two indictments, one of which charges him with conspiracy to violate the narcotic laws of the United States and the other with the unlawful sale of opium, and has moved for a new trial in each case.

The principal witness against Yee Haim was George H. White, an agent of the Narcotic Bureau of the Treasury Department. He testified that he came to Pittsburgh to see the defendant, after having made arrangement so to do through a telephone communication between a Chinese informer, Leong 'Long, a co-defendant in the conspiracy indictment and a…

2Cited by34 opinions

  1. Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Monroe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. United States v. PolakoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  4. People v. MalotteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State v. SteadmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API