Legal Opinion

Bissell Carpet Sweeper Co. v. Shane Co., Inc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1957No. 29,327PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEmmert, J.

Appellant, a Michigan corporation, alleged by its complaint it manufactured carpet sweepers, which had thereon its trade-mark “Bissell Carpet Sweeper Company,” which were sold in open competition in Indiana “with merchandise in the same general class produced by others”; that appellee was engaged in the retail business in the city of Indianapolis; that appellant had entered into voluntary contracts with certain retailers including H. P. Wasson & Co., pursuant to the Indiana Fair Trade Act which established minimum prices for its carpet sweepers throughout the state; that the appellee did not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sidle v. MajorsIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. White Cross Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Bulova Watch Co. v. Zale Jewelry Co. of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Corning Glass Works v. Ann & Hope, Inc. of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API