Legal Opinion

State v. Boyd

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1985No. 84-860PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.

R.C. 4511.19(A)(3) reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

“(A) No person shall operate any vehicle, streetcar, or trackless trolley within this state if any of the following apply: * *
“(3) The person has a concentration of ten-hundredths of one gram or more by weight of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of his breath;”

If the state is to be successful in the prosecution of a person charged with the violation of the preceding section, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the essential elements of the crime. State v. Nolton (1969), 19 Ohio St. 2d 133 [48 O.O.2d 119].…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. NoltonOhio Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Columbus v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. GreenwoodCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  3. State v. LominackOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. PorterOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API