Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. Brewbaker

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1999No. 98-15PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice,

Retired.

Appellant, Wyoming Workers’ Compensation Division (the Division), claims the district court erred in reversing the hearing examiner’s denial of benefits to appellee, Clarence W. Brewbaker (Brewbaker). The hearing examiner determined that the work activities leading to Brewbaker’s heart attack were not “unusual * * * or abnormal” as required by Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-603(b) (1997). Finding no evidence to support the hearing examiner’s conclusion, we affirm the order of the district court.

I. ISSUES

The Division presents the following issue for review:

A Was the Hearing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Stuckey v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. HarrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Loomer v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Sheth v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. HenriksenWyoming Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API