Legal Opinion

Khalsa v. Weinberger

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1985No. 84-5880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Appellant, a member of the Sikh religion, sued the Army for refusing, to process his enlistment application because he could not comply with Army appearance regulations. The district court dismissed the suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that such regulations are not subject to judicial review. Appellant contends *1412that the regulations are reviewable, that they were amended in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, and that they violated his First and Fifth Amendment rights. We affirm.

I

FACTS

Practicing Sikhs must wear unshorn head and facial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Khalsa v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API