Legal Opinion
United States v. Ferby
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 3, 2004No. Nos. 02-1506, 02-1535PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.
Defendants-appellants John A. Ferby and Darnyl Parker appeal from, inter alia, the district court’s evidentiary rulings, jury instructions, judgments of conviction, and sentencing decisions. Inasmuch as the parties are familiar with the facts underlying this appeal, we do not recite them here.
I. Evidentiary Rulings
The appellants argue that the district court erred by admitting under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) the statements of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- John J. Pitchell v. James F. Callan, Gregory Sargis and City of Hartford, David J. Lesser and Steven Del Sole, Special MastersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson FriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. RehakCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. SeaseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. LillemoeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- United States v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Timothy Conrad RehakCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.