Legal Opinion

Boude v. Union Pacific Railroad

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 2012No. DA 11-0412PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

*33¶1 On August 9, 2007, Philip Boude filed a Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) claim against his employer, Union Pacific Railroad Company, asserting that he experienced a work-related injury on July 29, 2006, due to the Railroad’s negligence. Following a seven-day trial in the First Judicial District Court, a jury ruled in favor of Union Pacific. Boude appeals. We reverse and remand.

ISSUE'

¶2 Boude submits the District Court committed multiple errors during the trial. We conclude that the single dispositive issue is whether the District Court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Daniel L. Kulavic, Cross-Appellee v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Stevenson v. Felco Industries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. PacifiCorp v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Crockett v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Masters Group International, Inc. v. Comerica BankMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Martin v. BNSF Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Alexander v. Bozeman Motors, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Boude v. Union Pacific RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API