Brashears v. Sight 'N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc.

OPINION

ADAMS, Judge:

¶ 1 Plaintiffs/Appellants Canady, Weathers, Kramer, Hembree, the Glenns, Durr, and the Speegles (Consumers 1 ) seek reversal of a trial court order which granted judgment to Defendant/Appellee (SSAC) on their claims against SSAC for deceit and alleged violations of the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act (the Act), et seq. 2 The essence of Consumers’ claims is that SSAC employed “bait and switch” advertising. 3

STANDARD OF REVIEW

¶ 2 SSAC attacked all of the claims on three grounds, filing a Motion to Dismiss and an alternative Motion to Strike. In doing so SSAC relied upon…