Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bartole v. Indiana State of

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided August 15, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00633Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION MARCUS T. BARTOLE, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:24-CV-633-GSL-AZ STATE OF INDIANA, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Marcus T. Bartole, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint. ECF 1. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API