Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Greenwood District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 3, 1975No. 75-252PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

The appellants, who comprise the Sebastian County election commission were mandamused by the trial court to create two separate quorum courts in that county,.i.e., the Greenwood District, the appellee, and the Fort Smith District in accordance with the provisions of Act 128 of 1975. Appellants contend that the trial court erred in holding Section 13 of that Act constitutional. It is appellants’ argument that this section of the Act is in irreconcilable conflict with our recent Amendment 55 to the Constitution of Arkansas (1874). We must agree.

It is true as appellee argues…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hodges v. DawdySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Patterson v. TempleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871
  3. Jewett v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  4. Ex parte JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871
  5. Scaramuzza v. McLeod, Comm'r of RevenuesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  3. Nichols v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Finch v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Henson v. Fleet Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API