Legal Opinion

VanStelle v. MacAskill

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 2003No. Docket 229123, 236435PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGage, J.

Both cases in these consolidated appeals raise the legal issue of ostensible agency in a medical office setting. In Docket No. 229123, defendants St. John Health System — Detroit-Macomb Campus, doing business as St. John Riverview Hospital and Medical Center (St. John Riverview Hospital), Riverview Medical Offices (Riverview Medical), and Detroit River-view Hospital (Riverview Hospital) (hereinafter col lectively referred to as the Riverview defendants) appeal by leave granted the circuit court’s order denying their motion for summary disposition. In Docket No. 236435, defendants St. John…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Grewe v. Mount Clemens General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Seasword v. Hilti, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Travelers Insurance v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Stanhope v. Los Angeles College of ChiropracticCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. JordanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Eads v. BormanOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Jones v. TMHDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Abigail Schmitt v. Genesys Regional Medical CenterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Abigail Schmitt v. Genesys Regional Medical CenterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API