Borden Company v. Fuerlinger
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.
The employer and insurance carrier insist here, as they did in the superior court, that there was not sufficient competent evidence in the record to support the award in the claimant’s favor, for the reason, as they contend, that the evidence conclusively showed that the claimant had, at the time of the hearing and when the award was entered, completely recovered from eczema contracted while in the employer’s service, and was not to any extent disabled as a result of that attack of the disease. In this connection they maintain that the evidence submitted upon the hearing demanded a finding…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SumrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Miller v. Independent Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davis v. Cobb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Brazier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Farrill v. Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.