Legal Opinion
Patricia E. Homeyer v. Stanley Tulchin Associates, Inc. And Alan Fox
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 31, 1996No. 95-3977PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Patricia Homeyer brought suit against her former employer, Stanley Tul-chin Associates, Inc. (“STA”), claiming she was fired in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12201 et seq. Homeyer alleged that she suffered from chronic severe allergic rhinitis and sinusitis and that her condition was aggravated by the environmental tobacco smoke (“ETS”) at STA’s office. She claimed that after requesting an accommodation from STA several times for her “disability,” she was terminated. The district court found that Homeyer could plead no…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thomas Jasany v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- American Nurses' Association v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Howard L. Jackson v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Louis P. Forrisi v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Stephen N. Roth, M.D. v. Lutheran General Hospital, Jerome Kraut, M.D., Seymour Metrick, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- John Duda v. Board of Education of Franklin Park Public School District No. 84, John Barry, Dan PietriniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Rhoads v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Barbara Davidson v. Midelfort Clinic, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Selenke v. Radiology ImagingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. J. H. Routh Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.