Legal Opinion

Bernaugh v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 31, 1997No. 96-565 CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge.

Plaintiff, Colette Bernaugh, filed a complaint on September 9, 1996, seeking the return of $201,817 in United States currency and other personal property seized under forfeiture laws by the United States District Court of Oklahoma and the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), allegedly in violation of plaintiffs constitutional rights. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on December 9, 1996, for: (1) lack of subject matter jurisdiction: (2) failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted; and (3) res judicata.

For the reasons set forth below, the court…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. Paalan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Casa De Cambio Comdiv S.A. de C.V. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Goad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API