Legal Opinion

Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. v. Chatterton

Rochester City Court

Decided November 4, 1974PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtReuben K. Davis, J.

Defendant brings on this motion seeking an order to vacate an order of seizure heretofore granted upon the defendant’s default. It appears that on May 28, 1974, ah order of seizure was issued 'by this court upon the defendant’s default in appearing. The order of seizure was subsequently stayed by an order of this court (signed by Hon. Habold L. Galloway), subject, however, to restoration of the order upon the plaintiff giving eight days’ written notice to the attorneys for the defendant. Such notice of restoration was given by plaintiff, and defendant thereafter brought on this motion to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. VezcaninoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974
  3. Northwest Engineering Co. v. RapplNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. Security Door & Panel Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. v. Chatterton, New York County Courts1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API