Tatum v. Schering Corp.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Dissent
I dissent.
I would not address the certified questions as the majority of this Court has. To me, the certified questions require us to reexamine the conflict between the purposes for awarding punitive damages and our rule of nonapportionment of damages among joint tort-feasors for an indivisible injury. Our previous decisions have ignored this conflict and answered the questions presented in a piecemeal fashion. These certified questions in a wrongful death context require me to address these problems head-on, and to reexamine the nature of damages that can be recovered under the Alabama…
2Cases cited118 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Haney v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.