Legal Opinion
United States v. Kollintzas
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 5, 2007No. 06-2034PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYKES, Circuit Judge.
A jury found Frank Kollintzas guilty of converting large sums of money from the City of East Chicago, Indiana. After the trial Kollintzas disappeared. The district court sentenced him in absentia and ordered that he pay over $25 million in restitution. The government immediately initiated collection proceedings, including garnishment, under the existing criminal docket number. While the garnishment proceedings were pending, Kollintzas’s wife, Joanna, filed for divorce in Indiana state court. The government served her with notice of the garnishments pursuant to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morgan v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Drye v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carter Products, Inc. v. Eversharp, Inc., and Thrifty Drug Stores Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Kevin Harold v. Christopher SteelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. ArefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & PagosIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. BeulkeDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2012
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.