Legal Opinion

Auto-Owners Insurance v. Churchman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1990No. Docket 111038PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action for declaratory relief, plaintiff appeals by leave granted from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary disposition entered on July 26, 1988, by the Emmet Circuit Court. MCR 2.116(0(10).

Plaintiff argues that it does not owe its insured, the estate of Henry Gordon Frost, Jr., deceased, a duty to defend it in the underlying tort action, or a duty to indemnify it for any judgment rendered against it in that underlying suit. Plaintiff contends that the injury complained of in the underlying suit falls within the exclusion from policy coverage for "bodily injury . . .…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Transamerica Insurance Corp. of America v. BoughtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Mattson v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Miller v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API