Legal Opinion

Auto-Owners Insurance v. Churchman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1992No. 88923, (Calendar No. 10)Published

1Opinion of the Court

440 Mich. 560 (1992)

489 N.W.2d 431

AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY

v.

CHURCHMAN

Docket No. 88923, (Calendar No. 10).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued January 8, 1992.

Decided September 9, 1992.

Plunkett & Cooney, P.C. (by Robert G. Kamenec and Charles H. Gano), for the plaintiff.

Stroup, Johnson & Tresidder, P.C. (by Stephen J. Tresidder), for defendant Beulah M. Churchman.

Burns & Spanos (by George D. Spanos) for defendant Frost Estate.

MALLETT, J.

This is a declaratory action to determine the insurer's duty to defend or indemnify its insured for the murder of Gary Churchman.

We granted leave to consider…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Upjohn Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API