Legal Opinion

People v. Schaaf

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1983No. FO02061PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, Acting P. J.

Statement of the Case

This case presents the recurring troublesome question of whether a defendant is entitled to presentence custody credit for the time spent in jail awaiting sentence in a particular case while, at the same time, the defendant was serving a sentence on an unrelated offense. We conclude that under In re Atiles (1983) 33 Cal.3d 805 [191 Cal.Rptr. 452, 662 P.2d 910] a defendant is entitled to credit for the entire time he spends in jail awaiting sentence if the restraint on the unrelated crime does not precede the restraint caused by the pending…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re AtilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re BentleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. In Re PollockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. PennerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. AdrianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. People v. JoynerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. RatliffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. People v. CornettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. People v. GoodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API