Legal Opinion

Albert Elia Building Co. v. County of Monroe

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJames H. Boomer, J.

Petitioner brings this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review the act of the Monroe County Legislature in awarding the general contract for the construction of the "Resource Recovery Facility” to the respondent Hyland and Sons, Inc. Petitioner claims that Hyland, by refusing to extend *335its bid beyond the 45-day period, had in effect withdrawn its bid and for that reason the award to Hyland was improper.

Section 105 of the General Municipal Law provides that when a bid deposit or other security is required "a person or corporation submitting a bid may withdraw the same if no award of the contract…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. John W. Rouse Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. Hunkin-Conkey Construction Co. v. City of DunkirkNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hunkin-Conkey Construction Co. v. City of DunkirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Albert Elia Building Co. v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API