Legal Opinion

Hunkin-Conkey Construction Co. v. City of Dunkirk

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Willard W. Cass, Jr., J.

This is a motion by the plaintiffs for summary judgment. The defendant also seeks summary judgment and has submitted a cross motion therefor.

From the papers submitted the following facts appear to be established and uncontroverted.

The plaintiff contractors submitted a bid to perform the general construction work for a proposed sewage treatment plant. The bid was in the amount of $7,599,293 and was submitted by the deadline imposed by the defendant, City of Dunkirk, of August 31, 1971. When the bids were opened, three other bids were also submitted. They were as follows:

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. R. Fuels, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Hunkin-Conkey Construction Co. v. City of DunkirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  3. Albert Elia Building Co. v. County of MonroeNew York Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API