Electrolux Corp. v. Val-Worth, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentFraNK, J.
I must dissent from a complete reversal of the injunction granted herein after a trial of the issues, although concurring with the majority that no reference is required and that the plaintiff failed to establish any basis for an award of damages.
My disagreement with the majority rests upon its refusal to sustain so much of the injunctive relief granted by the learned trial court as restrains the defendant, in radio, television and other advertising, from associating the word “ Famous ” with Electrolux in such a manner as shall be capable of misleading the public.
The facts as found are that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.