Legal Opinion
Musmeci v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided August 23, 2001No. Civ.A. 97-2757PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BARB IE R, Distiret Judge.
Plaintiffs are former employees of Schwegmann Giant Super Markets (“SGSM”) who have filed suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., or alternatively, under state law, seeking to have their pension benefits in the form of retirement grocery vouchers and/or monetary payments reinstated, and for equitable relief requiring Schwegmann, the plan sponsor, to fulfill accrual, vesting, and funding requirements under ERISA. Schwegmann terminated the voucher program in February…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Musmeci v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Blum v. Spectrum Restaurant Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
- Stoffels Ex Rel. SBC Telephone Concession Plan v. SBC Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
- Walton v. Nova Information SystemsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007
- Abira Medical Laboratories, LLC, d/b/a Genesis Diagnostics v. Healthy BlueDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.