Legal Opinion

State v. Ulrey

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 29, 2009No. 98,411PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

Daniel S. Ulrey appeals from his convictions of possession of anhydrous ammonia with the intent to manufacture a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia with the intent to manufacture a controlled substance. Ulrey contends the evidence used against him was seized by an unlawful search of the vehicle in which he was riding. Ulrey also contends the trial court improperly admitted hearsay laboratory test results at trial. We affirm.

On September 22, 2004, Deputy Matt Tatro of the Reno County Sheriff s Department was on routine patrol. At approximately 9 a.m., he saw…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. State v. EwertzCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  3. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API