State v. Ewertz
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Standridge, J.;
Rhonda K. Ewertz appeals her conviction of possession of methamphetamine and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to introduce a controlled substance into the human body, claiming the district court erred in denying her motion to suppress. She argues the search of her car was not permissible as a search incident to arrest and the search of her makeup bag was not permissible under the plain view doctrine.
Facts
The parties stipulated to most of the following facts, with the exception of the testimony from the hearing on the motion to suppress specifically referenced below.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. CanaanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Mose B. CoffeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.