Legal Opinion

Dorey v. Dorey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 7, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeCourcy, J.

This is a bill in equity brought to reach and apply in payment of a debt, property fraudulently conveyed by the defendant John J. Dorey. The facts found by *360the master which are material to the issues now before us are as follows: The plaintiff and the defendant Dorey were married November 9, 1914. On April 21, 1916, she filed in the Suffolk Probate Court a petition for separate support against him: and that court issued a decree on June 15, 1916, ordering him to pay her $10 a week pendente lite. This decree has not been modified or vacated by the court; and nothing has been paid the plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. McIlroy v. McIlroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Shaw v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Green v. GaskillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Martell v. DoreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Weidman v. WeidmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Corkum v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Rosa v. RosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Bennett v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Commonwealth v. BoothMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API