Legal Opinion

Quesada v. Pietrusiak

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided May 19, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00086Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO DIVISION ROBERT C. QUESADA, § Plaintiff, § § No. 3:21-CV-00086-KC v. § § STAN PIETRUSIAK, DIRECTOR, § EQUAL EMPLOYMENT § OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, § et al., § Defendants. § REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On this day, the Court considered the status of the above-styled and numbered cause. On April 1, 2021, Plaintiff Robert C. Quesada, proceeding pro se, filed his application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1.) On April 7, 2021, this Court granted Plaintiff’s application, and his Complaint was…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API