Legal Opinion

Pioneer Reserve, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 26, 2016No. 14-376CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Contracts; Environmental Mitigation Banking.

OPINION AND ORDER

ERIC G. BRUGGINK, Senior Judge

This case illustrates the confusion and unfairness which can inadvertently result from an agency acting simultaneously in both a contractual and regulatory capacity. The agency here is the United States Army Corps of Engineers operating through the Alaska Division (“the agency” or “the Corps”). By statute, the Corps is given responsibility to regulate the discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States. See 33 U.S.C. § 1344 (2016), In order to assist it in achieving that end, it has erected an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pioneer Reserve, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Pioneer Reserve, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ecosystem Investment Partners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API