Legal Opinion

Ecosystem Investment Partners v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 25, 2017No. 16-1549CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Bid protest; Standing; Waiver; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1); Interested Party; Prospective Bidder.

Eric G. Bruggink, Senior Judge

OPINION

Plaintiff, Ecosystem Investment Partners (“EIP”), protests the United States Army Corps of Engineers’ (the “Corps”) award of a contract to intervenor, Crosby Dredging, LLC (“Crosby Dredging”), for the provision of dredging and construction services as part of a compensatory environmental mitigation plan to offset other work the Corps was doing to safeguard against possible future storm damage. EIP was not a bidder in connection with this dredging solicitation, but…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Weeks Marine, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  3. Rex Service Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Ramcor Services Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API