Legal Opinion
East Coast Novelty Co. v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 11, 1992No. 90 Civ. 2108 (RWS)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The Defendants have moved for leave to reargue the Court’s prior opinion in this matter dated January 2, 1992, 781 F.Supp. 999 (S.D.N.Y.1992) (the “Opinion”), pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 3(j) of the Civil Rules of the Southern District of New York. For the reason set forth below, the motion is denied.
To be entitled to reargument under Local Rule 3(j), the Defendants must demonstrate that the Court overlooked controlling decisions or factual matters that were put before the Court on the underlying motion. Novak…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kenneth S. Cameron v. Matthew Fogarty and John HalbigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Ashley Meadows Farm, Inc. v. American Horse Shows Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- East Coast Novelty Co., Inc. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Novak v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Antonsen v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
3Cited by34 opinions
- German by German v. Federal Home Loan Mortg. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Shamis v. Ambassador Factors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Dietrich v. BauerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.