Ruckert v. Wayne Township
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
1Opinion of the Court
MOTTO, P.J.,
Before the court for disposition is the plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. The plaintiffs (“Ruckerts”) contend that because of admissions contained in the answer and new matter of the defendants (“Ottavianis”), the court must find as a matter of law that the Ottavianis are engaged in land development as the result of improvements made by them to roadways, therefore entitling the Ruckerts to a court order compelling the Ottavianis to comply with, and the defendant township to enforce, the township’s subdivision and Land Development Ordinance (“SALDO”). If applicable,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kassouf v. Township of ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Hart v. O'MALLEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Mountain Village v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Lehigh Asphalt Paving & Construction Co. v. Board of Supervisors of East Penn TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Rusciolelli v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.