Legal Opinion

Hart v. O'MALLEY

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1996PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The question in this appeal is whether Appellees David and Ann Hart may maintain an action for wrongful use of civil proceedings, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8351, against the Appellant, Elizabeth O’Malley, even though they were not named as defendants in the underlying action that they allege was wrongfully brought. Under the facts of this case, we hold that the Harts have stated a cause of action, and therefore affirm the order of Superior Court, which reversed the common pleas court order granting O’Malley’s preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer.

David and Ann Hart own…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosen v. American Bank of RollaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Soja v. Factoryville Sportsmen's ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Lessard v. Jersey Shore State BankDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Shiner v. MoriartySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. One Thousand Fleet Ltd. Partnership v. GuerrieroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Bannar v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Hart v. O'MALLEYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Bannar v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API