Legal Opinion

Beaumont Irrigating Co. v. De Laune

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1914No. 6719PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Jefferson County; John M. Conley, Judge. Action by A. De Baune against the Beaumont Irrigating Company. From a judgment striking items from a bill of costs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcMEANS, J.

This is a proceeding by motion of appellee, plaintiff below, to retax costs in cause No. 2658, styled A. De Baune v. Beaumont Irrigating Company, tried in the district court of Jefferson county. He alleged that certain items of costs taxed by the clerk were not properly taxable as costs and never constituted any portion of the cost of suit; but, if such items were in fact costs áccruing in the case, they were not taxed by the clerk within two years nor within four years next after the judgment was rendered, and were therefore barred by the statute of limitation of two and four years. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Patton v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hammonds v. HammondsTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Guerra v. Perez & Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
  3. Vacuum Oil Co. v. Liberty Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Hammonds v. HammondsTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Marriage of Wyly, Matter OfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API