Advance Whip & Novelty Co. v. Benevolent Protective Order of Elks
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtGeaham, J.
On July 17 to 19, 1930, one H. M. Knight, the owner of a circus, gave an exhibition of the circus at Montpelier in the name of the defendant. The exhibition was advertised as the Elks ’ circus. The' contract between Knight and the defendant was not received in evidence, but witnesses testified that the arrangement was made with a so-called committee of the defendant, and that it provided for a division of the net profits between Knight and the defendant. Joseph G. Abair was the Exalted Ruler of the defendant lodge, and also a member of the committee.
Just before coming to Montpelier, this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aiken v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869
- Territt v. BartlettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
- Gaylord v. SoragenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
- Widham v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Mound v. BarkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maltz v. SaxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Jasper v. RossmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950