Legal Opinion

Advance Whip & Novelty Co. v. Benevolent Protective Order of Elks

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 4, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeaham, J.

On July 17 to 19, 1930, one H. M. Knight, the owner of a circus, gave an exhibition of the circus at Montpelier in the name of the defendant. The exhibition was advertised as the Elks ’ circus. The' contract between Knight and the defendant was not received in evidence, but witnesses testified that the arrangement was made with a so-called committee of the defendant, and that it provided for a division of the net profits between Knight and the defendant. Joseph G. Abair was the Exalted Ruler of the defendant lodge, and also a member of the committee.

Just before coming to Montpelier, this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aiken v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869
  2. Territt v. BartlettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  3. Gaylord v. SoragenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
  4. Widham v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  5. Mound v. BarkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maltz v. SaxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  2. Jasper v. RossmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API