Legal Opinion
Cella Barr Associates, Inc. v. Cohen
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 27, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 91-0332PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
Celia Barr Associates, Inc. (“Celia Barr”) appeals from a judgment dismissing its claims for contribution and indemnity and from the denial of its motion for new trial. We affirm the judgment for the reasons which follow.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On June 25, 1986, Gerald and Edwina Glassman, Plainville Electro Plating Company, and Plainville West, Inc. (“Glassmans”) conditionally contracted with Miles and William Munzer and Technical Metal Finishing Corporation (“Munzers”) for the purchase of Marro Plating, an electroplating facility in Scottsdale, Arizona. On June 30,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Frey v. StonemanArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Dietz v. General Electric Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cella Barr Associates, Inc. v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994