Legal Opinion

Application of Sydney M. Spatz and Marvin Koral

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 14, 1967No. Patent Appeal 7666PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1-12 in appellants’ application1 for “Fire-Retardant Composition Derived from Tetrabromophthalic Acid Anhydride,” as “unpatentable” in view of certain prior art.

The subject matter is reflected in claims 1 and 6:

1. A method of preparing polyester resins that have fire-retardant characteristics when cured, which comprises: preparing a mixture of glycol and a component of the group consisting of saturated diearboxylic acids and anhydrides thereof, said component containing at least 10 mol…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Application of Kenneth B. CoferCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. Application of Lyman S. AllenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of Raymond Wynkoop and Shirley C. Bartlett, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  2. Application of Raymond Wynkoop and Shirley C. Bartlett, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  3. Application of Sydney M. Spatz and Marvin KoralCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API