Legal Opinion
W. Irving Herskovits Fur Co. v. Hollander
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotillo, J.
Plaintiff, by its motion, seeks summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice and the defendant by his cross-motion has moved for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice and section 476 of the Civil Practice Act.
The plaintiff sues upon a written guaranty executed by the defendant. During the month of March, 1929, one H. L. Simmons on behalf of himself and/or H. L. Simmons & Co., Inc., and/or Kurzman, Inc., were desirous of purchasing goods on credit from the plaintiff. The value of the goods was $44,463.75 to be paid for on November 30, 1929.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gates v. . McKeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Catskill National Bank v. DumaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Gamble v. CuneoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Gamble v. . CuneoNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Hamilton Trust Co. v. ShevlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Deering Milliken, Inc. v. Georgette Juniors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- W. Irving Herskovits Fur Co. v. HollanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Wesselman v. Engel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955