Legal Opinion

Raladam Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1930No. 5429PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

The so-called patent medicine habit has a traditional hold upon the masses of the American people. The medical profession has always contended that auto-diagnosis, drug store purchases, and self-medication are dangerous to the publie health, and ought to be suppressed or minimized. The evil, at least in some degree, is not to be denied; but how it should be stopped has been considered an insoluble problem. This record reveals the solution. The type of advertising which has long been customary for the commercial promotion of these remedies 1 is to be scrutinized and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Simeon Management Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Coca-Cola Co. v. BuschDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Scutt v. BassettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Good-Grape Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API