Legal Opinion
Neway Anchorlok International, Inc. v. Longwood Industries, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided September 8, 1999No. 1:99CV225Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, Chief Judge.
Defendants have moved to dismiss the Plaintiffs Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons which follow, the motion is granted.
ALLEGATIONS
Plaintiff Neway Anchorlok, International has brought its Amended Complaint in this Court alleging five counts for relief against Defendants Longwood Industries, Inc., Longwood Elastomers, Inc., Polymer Development, L.L.C., and Nelson Teed. The five counts are premised on the antitrust laws of the United States of America, and specifically 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, and 15, as well as the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.